|
GRAMMATICAL INTRODUCTION In an English dictionary one will not find an entry “horses”; every user of the dictionary is supposed to know that “horses” is the plural of “horse”, or that failing to find “horses” in the dictionary, he will go to “horse” and know what the difference is between “horse” and “horses”. In Greek there are three kinds of words which have a (sometimes large) number of different forms which will not all be found in the dictionaries, but for which the reader will be referred to one head word (also known as source word) and supposed to be able to derive the rest from this head form. The three kinds are: 1) substantives, 2) adjectives, 3) verbs. 1) Any Greek substantive noun (such as English horse, thing, goodness ) shows many more forms than the average English one; the differences occur in the endings. The divers forms are coupled to the sbs’s function in the sentence. For instance “A father knows his son.” may be expressed in Greek by “Πατὴρ τὸν υἱὸν ἔγνωκεν.”, whilst “A son knows his father.” may be translated “Υἱὸς τὸν πατέρα ἔγνωκεν.” In the first example “father” is the subject of the sentence, in the second it is the object. “A son procures a livelihood for his father.”, where “father” is indirect object, may be translated “Υἱὸς τῷ πατρὶ βίον παρέχει.”, whereas “A son takes care of his father’s livelihood.” would be translated “Υἱὸς τὸν τοῦ πατρὸς βίον κομίζει.” Finally, “Father, procure your son a livelihood.” becomes “῏Ω πάτερ, τῷ υἱῷ βίον πάρεχε.” This exhausts the singular forms of πατήρ. The names of the forms are, consecutively, Nominative, Accusative, Dative, Genitive and Vocative. In the plural there is no separate form for the V, the N being used when addressing. Obviously it would be physically impossible for each word to have a completely individual set of endings (the declension). There are three sets of endings (with variations inside each set), one of which is assumed by every sbs; the word for son clearly follows another set of case endings than father. [Very rarely sbs's follow more than one declination.] 2) Adjective nouns (such as English big, red, good) also show a multiplicity of different forms, even more than sbs’s, but the rules which govern the taking on of endings are very different from those concerning sbs’s. To show that an adj qualifies a sbs there is the principle of congruence (or agreement): the adj must assume one particular ending; the N of πατήρ, for instance, necessitates an adjectival ending different from the G and so forth, also for the plural. Furthermore Greek sbs’s belong to one of three genders, either Masculine,Feminine or Neuter and each of these genders may command a different form of the adj. So “A good father”, “A good mother” and “A good slave” are expressed by Πατὴρ ἀγαθός, Μήτηρ ἀγαθή and ᾿Ανδράποδον ἀγαθόν. This principle would generate 27 different forms of the adj (5 cases sg, 4 cases pl times 3 genders), but there is some overlap. The physical shape of the endings, moreover, is the same as that of the substantives. All this may seem pretty mysterious at first sight, but a study of the morphology of the Greek noun will no doubt enlighten you. *Greek nouns also have separate dual (twofold) forms, not in consistent use. |
3) Verbs (such as English follow, flatten, compare) show a great number of forms, to the tune of about 400 per average individual verb. There are different forms for Active, Passive and a type of form in between, the middle (or Medium); these notions will be defined at the appropriate places. Also the list of linguistic terms may be consulted. Then there are four classes of forms, which I shall call “phases”, all carrying their own characteristics: the durative, the aorist, the future and the perfect; these notions will also be explained at the appropriate places, but the names by themselves may also convey an inkling of their meaning. So we would get 12 formations, or units of conjugation: A du, A ao, A fu, A pf; etc. through to Md pf. But P du and Md du do not differ in form and neither do P pf and Md pf. So instead of 12 we get 10 units. In each unit (apart from a few blind spots) there are a present indicative, a past indicative, a subjunctive, an optative (all with a 1st, 2nd and 3rd person singular and plural) and an imperative (with 2nd and 3rd persons sg and pl); in addition there is an infinitive and a complete set of congruent forms of a participle (which, being an adj, must have as many forms as other adj’s). Per unit this totals about 40 forms and as there are 10 units this adds up to approximately 400 forms per verb. The main “blind spots” are: there is no Ao pr ind, no Fu pa ind, no Fu subj, no Fu imp. Take a look at canonical conjugation to see examples of what has been stated above. *Verbs too have separate forms for the dual, but only incidentally used; these are not included in the conjugational paradigms, but described separately. The system(s) according to which all these forms are made are fairly rational, but could be more so: that is why the verb takes up the major part of any Greek grammar. Determining forms: to get at the function and meaning of forms in a Greek text one will have to "determine" these forms, this is to find which of all the forms of such a word one has encountered. Only after finding which case of a sbs one has met with can one ascertain what the function in the sentence is; determining the form of an adjective allows one to see with which sbs it agrees (or does not agree); for verb forms one can see which tense is meant, which mood etc. a) Substantives: case and number make up a complete determination; more than one is possible. b) Adjectives: this is more complex; a complete statement must be made of all genders, cases and numbers with which the adjective can be considered to agree: >M/F/Ne- sg/pl/dl -N/G/D/Ac. More than one of the three categories are possible. c) Verbs: work from left to right on the synopsis: du/ao/fu/perf- A/Md/P/MdP- pr-ind/pa-ind/subj/opt/imp-1/2/3 sg/pl or du/ao/fu/perf-A/Md/P/MdP-inf or du/ao/fu/perf- A/Md/P/MdP-ptc followed by a determination as of adjectives. Phase and voice may be interchanged.
|
abbreviations
cases: nominative, genitive, dative,
accusative
voices: active, middle,
passive
adjectives
adjuncts
adverbs
anomalous nouns
article
assimilation
augment
canonical conjugation
composite verbs
contracted verbs
eimi be
eimi go exercises
for dummies
grammatical introduction grammatical
terms
keystoexercise moods: indicative,
subjunctive,
optative,
imperative,
infinitive,
participle
morphemes oida phases: durative, aorist future, perfect reading Greek: 1 2 reduplication script stem synopsis noun synopsis verb